I know since version 1.1.2 , xstream support using public accessors instead of fields. but i can't find any example in doucment to find out how to do this.
-- 刘远志 QQ:2065254 |
Hi 刘远志,
________________________________ From: liuyuanzhi AT gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 6:26 AM Subject: [xstream-user] How to use public accessor instead of field? I know since version 1.1.2 , xstream support using public accessors instead of fields. but i can't find any example in doucment to find out how to do this. -- 刘远志 QQ:2065254 ________________________________ I am not sure, what you are really referring to, but you might refer the JavaBeanConverter ... do you? - Jörg |
version 1.1.2 major change states this:
"XSTR-186, Option to serialize JavaBeans using public accessors, rather than private fields (contributed by Andrea Aime)." what i want is xstream just serializes properties that have a getter method. and kick other private fields out. i don't know how to do this. On 6/28/06,
Jörg Schaible <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi 刘远志, -- 刘远志 QQ:2065254 |
In reply to this post by Jarod Liu
Hi 刘远志,
________________________________ From: liuyuanzhi AT gmail.com Sent: Wednesday, June 28, 2006 8:56 AM Subject: Re: [xstream-user] How to use public accessor instead of field? version 1.1.2 major change states this: "XSTR-186 <http://jira.codehaus.org/browse/XSTR-186> , Option to serialize JavaBeans using public accessors, rather than private fields (contributed by Andrea Aime)." what i want is xstream just serializes properties that have a getter method. and kick other private fields out. i don't know how to do this. ________________________________ This is off by default, since XStream uses normally a converter based on reflection. You have to register a JavaBeanConverter with a priority equals or one better than this reflection based converter. See unit test as an example: http://fisheye.codehaus.org/browse/xstream/tags/XSTREAM_1_1_3/xstream/src/test/com/thoughtworks/xstream/converters/javabean/JavaBeanConverterTest.java?r=554 If you want this behaviour only for certain types instead for all classes, you have to derive from the JavaBeanConverter and adjust the canConvert method accordingly. - Jörg |
thank you very much. the unit test is a good example for me.
On 6/28/06, Jörg Schaible <[hidden email]> wrote: Hi 刘远志, -- 刘远志 QQ:2065254 |
Free forum by Nabble | Edit this page |